Allowed

Md. Firoj v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jan 2019CR. MISC./2789/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, arrested in 2018 for multiple offences including rioting and criminal conspiracy, sought bail. The court granted bail on Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, observing the case's 16-year pendency, and directed the trial court to conclude the trial within six months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; trial directed to conclude within six months.

Md. Firoj Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2789 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2003 Thana- ANDHRATHARHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Firoj Son of Md. Isha, Resident of village-Gidarganj, P.S. Andhrathari, District-Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagnnath Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 22-01-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶11

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Andharathari P.S. Case No. 18 of 2003 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 427, 452, 380, 436 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 Explosive Substance Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 17.11.2018. He further submits that he has surrendered in connection with the P.S. Case No. 18 of 2003 on 17.11.2018 as the petitioner was ignorant about the pendency of the case and the fact that he was made accused in that case. The trial in the instant case being Session Trial No. 593 of 2013 has begun.

¶13

Considering the fact that the case was registered in

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2789 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2019 2/2

¶15

2003 nearly 16 years have gone. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that all the accused persons areon bail, considering the above the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jhanjharpur in connection with Andharathari P.S. Case No. 18 of 2003 subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed in the case. Failure on the part of the petitioner the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial positively within a period of six months from today.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶17

mdrashid/-

¶18

U T

Md. Firoj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Firoj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheo Kumar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Amir Subhani and Anr.

Kauleshwar Paswan Vs Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad

Lalo Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Santosh Kumar Dikshit Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bharat Lall Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Harishankar Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.