The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, apprehending arrest under multiple IPC sections, on furnishing a bail bond with sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C., subject to standard conditions.
Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26820 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2018 Thana- SANGRAMPUR DistrictEast Champaran
======================================================
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26820 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 2/3
Resident of Village- Sangrampur Mathiya, P.S.- Sangrampur, DistrictEast Champaran.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Dilip Kumar Tondon, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
2 24-04-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26820 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019
3/3
under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -
(i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives of the petitioners.
(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners facing charges under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 448, 380, and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Ashok Kumar @ Kerai Mahto and Another vs the State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
