Allowed

Manish Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Apr 2019CR. MISC./26314/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case alleging offences of cheating, forgery, and assault under the IPC. The court released him on bail with conditions regarding sureties, conduct during trial, and physical presence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding physical presence and investigation.

Manish Sharma Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26314 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-731 Year-2018 Thana- SAHARSA DistrictSaharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANISH SHARMA, male, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Prayag Sharma Resident of Village - Patuaha, P.S. - Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 23-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences

¶14

alleged under Sections 341, 323, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 731 of 2018.

¶15

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the thrust of accusation is against other coaccused persons namely Rudal Sharma, Babuan Sharma and Laxman Sharma. The accusation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶16

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26314 of 2019(2) dt.23-04-2019 2/2

¶18

petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 731 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶19

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶20

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶21

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶22

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶23

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶24

Ibrar//-

Manish Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arti Devi Vs Sarvan Rai

Ruby Kumari Vs Jatashankar Mishra

Rinku Kumari Vs Pravin Kumar

Raushani Devi @ Rosani Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Subhash Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Buttu @ Bittu @ Kaushal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar