Allowed

Nippu Singh @ Nippu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jul 2019CR. MISC./25150/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under IPC and Arms Act, considering allegations of false implication and prior bail to co-accused, subject to conditions and production within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Nippu Singh @ Nippu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25150 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2017 Thana- KHIJARSARAI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NIPPU SINGH @ NIPPU KUMAR Son of Awadh Singh Resident of Village - Ismailpur, P.S.- Khizar Sarai, Distt - Gaya.... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shivendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 26-07-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 354 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354 (B), 376, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication as no such occurrence has taken place. The two girls are aged about 19 and 22 years and was married also. The case in question has been lodged because of some land dispute and in paragraph 10 of the case diary it has come that the allegation of lifting the girls is not true. It is under these circumstances two co-accused Pramod Singh and Vicky Singh in Cr. Misc. No. 24053 of 2019 by learned co-ordinate Bench

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25150 of 2019(3) dt.26-07-2019 2/2

¶16

of this Court vide its order dated 14.05.2019 has been granted anticipatory bail to those petitioners.

¶17

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein the victim girls have not been produced before the I. O. and further that in the case diary it has come that no such occurrence of lifting the girls and firing has been found true and on that basis co-accused have been admitted to anticipatory bail by a learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let the petitioner above named in case of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Khizarsarai P.S. Case No. 354 of 2017, be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (POCSO Act), Gaya, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶20

avin/-

¶21

U T

Nippu Singh @ Nippu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nippu Singh @ Nippu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Mahavira Buildwell Private Limited Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeshwar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Bali Paswan Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Rishu Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ansar Vs the State of Bihar

Raj Hansh Sah Vs The State of Bihar