Allowed

Raj Hansh Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jul 2019CR. MISC./25094/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Raj Hansh Sah, in connection with offenses under Section 392 IPC, noting that his implication relied solely on a co-accused's confession with no physical evidence recovered.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner shall be released on bail on arrest or surrender within four weeks upon execution of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000 with two sureties.

Raj Hansh Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25094 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2018 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Hansh Sah Son of Ram Dhani Prasad @ Dhani Sah, Resident of Village - Gambhirpur, P.S.- Nautan, Distt.- Siwan

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 26-07-2019

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶10

A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

Petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 23 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR, the name of the petitioner has transpired in confessional statement of the co-accused Niraj Kumar Bhagat, however, neither from the possession of Niraj Kumar Bhagat nor from the house of this petitioner any incriminating article has been recovered. It is submitted that prior to the present case the petitioner was never implicated in any criminal case but on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused now the petitioner has also been made accused in

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25094 of 2019(3) dt.26-07-2019 2/2

¶14

Nautan P.S. Case No. 31 of 2018. Learned counsel submits that save and except the confessional statement there is no other material which may give any reason to believe that petitioner was involved in the alleged occurrence.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State is present and has readout the case diary.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, wherein the implication of the petitioner is based on the confessional statement of the co-accused alone and there is no recovery of any incriminating article either from the co-accused or from this petitioner.

¶17

Let the petitioner above named, in case of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 23 of 2018, be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., XII, Siwan, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶19

vats/ved

¶20

U T

Raj Hansh Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Hansh Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shree Mahavira Buildwell Private Limited Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajeshwar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Bali Paswan Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Nippu Singh @ Nippu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rishu Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ansar Vs the State of Bihar