Dismissed

Hiraman Yadav @ Hira Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2019CR. MISC./16723/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna rejected the bail application of Hiraman Yadav, an accused in a serious criminal case involving multiple charges under the IPC and enactments. The court noted the petitioner's criminal antecedents and the prosecution's evidence, initially refusing bail but granting liberty to renew after charge framing.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected; liberty granted to renew application after framing of charges.

Hiraman Yadav @ Hira Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16723 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2014 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

HIRAMAN YADAV @ HIRA YADAV Son of Baleshwar Yadav, Resident of Village-Barha, P.S.-Chhakerbandha (Dumariya), District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 22-07-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is accused in connection with Raushanganj P.S. Case No. 81 of 2014 registered under sections 147, 148, 149, 120(B), 121(A), 122, 124(A), 323, 325, 427, 385, 386 and 395 of the I.P.C., section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act, sections 13, 16, 18 and 20 of the U.A.P. Act and section 17 of the C.L.A. Act pending in the Court of S.D.J.M., Sherghati, Gaya.

¶14

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely by been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2018.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16723 of 2019(4) dt.22-07-2019 2/2

¶17

opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that the petitioner has criminal antecedent. He is accused in several cases. The witnesses have also supported the version of the prosecution.

¶18

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

¶19

However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

¶20

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶21

shailendra/-

¶22

U T

Hiraman Yadav @ Hira Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hiraman Yadav @ Hira Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Naresh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamla Yadav @ Kamlesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Wakil Kumar Das Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Nawab @ Nawab Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Mian @ Balau @ Izharul Haque Vs The State of Bihar