Mukesh Ram v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail petition arising from a delayed trial for Section 304B IPC offence, the High Court rejected the prayer. The court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings day-to-day to conclude by October 31, 2019, noting the trial was still ongoing.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail stands rejected; trial to be concluded by 31.10.2019.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15384 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2017 Thana- SURYAPUR District- Rohtas
======================================================
MUKESH RAM Son of Ramchandra Ram, Resident of Village - Bahuara, P.S.- Suryapura, Distt - Rohtas at Sasaram.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
3 17-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail granting considering the stage of the trial.
How to proceed with the trial given that over two years have passed since the arrest.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh Ram
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Anjana Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court