This is an oral order in a criminal miscellaneous petition. The bench, noting that the trial has substantially advanced, declined the petitioner's bail plea and directed expedition for the trial to conclude by October 31, 2019.
Bail rejected; trial expedited to conclude by October 31, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25624 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2016 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar
======================================================
Mantu Ram, Son of Vinod Ram, Resident Of Village - Barahi, P.S.- Kochas, District-Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER
3 15-05-2019 In view of the fact that the trial has advanced
substantially, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected.
Let the trial be expedited so as to conclude positively by the 31st of October, 2019.
(Anjana Mishra, J)
PNM
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted given that the trial has substantially advanced.
Mantu Ram
The State of Bihar
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
