Allowed

Sujay Singh @ Fitar @ Fighter v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Mar 2019CR. MISC./15118/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under IPC Sections 364, 307, 504/34 and Arms Act Sections 26, 27. The petitioner was released upon furnishing bail bonds and ensuring sureties are close relatives.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two close relative sureties.

Sujay Singh @ Fitar @ Fighter Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15118 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2016 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUJAY SINGH @ FITAR @ FIGHTER, Son of Late Arjun Singh @ Late Arjun Pd. Singh, resident of village - Utari Bhadas, P.S.- Khagaria (Muffasil), Dist- Khagaria

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2/ 12-03-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

Petitioner seeks bail in Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.569 of 2016 corresponding to Sessions Trial No.92 of 2017/ Trial No.253 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 364, 307, 504/34 Indian Penal Code and Sections 26, 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

Counsel for the petitioner submits that victim has been recovered. He has not taken name of the petitioner in the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

¶15

In the written report, there is specific allegation of causing firearm injury against co-accused, Ranjit Kumar, on account of which the informant sustained injury.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15118 of 2019(2) dt.12-03-2019 2/2

¶17

Counsel for the petitioner further submits that other co-accused have already been granted regular bail vide Annexure-2 series.

¶18

Petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2017.

¶19

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No.569 of 2016 corresponding to Sessions Trial No.92 of 2017/ Trial No.253 of 2017 , subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioner.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶21

J. Alam/-

¶22

U T

Sujay Singh @ Fitar @ Fighter v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujay Singh @ Fitar @ Fighter v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Mali Vs The State Of Bihar

Raj Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Jaiki Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandeep Gupta @ Sandeep Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Vimal Kumar @ Bantha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Haider @ Bapaiya @ Md. Mukhtar Vs The State Of Bihar