Court condoned 7-day delay in appeal. Granted pre-arrest bail allowing surrender within six weeks, subject to bond and sureties under SC/ST Act conditions.
Condoned 7-day delay; granted pre-arrest bail subject to surrender within six weeks and furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.48 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-194 Year-2018 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 26-02-2019
Re: Interlocutory Application No. 01/2019
This appeal has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 7 days in filing the memo of appeal.
Considering the averments made in the application and submission of learned counsel for the appellants, the delay in filing the memo of appeal is hereby condoned.
Accordingly, this Interlocutory Application No.01/2019 is allowed.
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.48 of 2019
The appellants seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 194 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 447, 504, 308, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(r)(s)(i) of SC/ST Act.
Allegation against the appellants is that due to non supply of
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.48 of 2019 dt.26-02-2019 2/2
toddy, they have assaulted the informant and others and there is specific allegation against appellant no.1 is that he assaulted the informant by khanti on his head.
Submission of learned counsel for the appellants is that the field of the appellants is situated near the house of the informant and he used to graze the crops by cattle, due to which there were some altercations took place and for that the present false and concocted case has been lodged against the appellants.
Heard learned Special P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, let appellants, above named, be surrendered within a period of six weeks and on surrender they will release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gaya, in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 194 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set-aside.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
Amjad/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the memo of appeal is to be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Whether the appellants are entitled to pre-arrest bail in the CPSCSC case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kamlesh Yadav
Manju Devi
Champa Devi
State of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
