Dismissed

Ramesh Chandra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC26 Sept 2018C. REV./326/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-paragraph oral order dismissing a review petition on admission. The court held there was no apparent error in the impugned order dismissing a civil revision regarding a time-barred building construction contract claim, as the delay in preparing the final bill did not warrant a review.

What did the court decide?

The review petition stands dismissed on admission stage itself.

Ramesh Chandra Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.326 of 2017

¶2

¶3

C.R. 168 of 2014

¶4

====================================================== Ramesh Chandra Choudhary, Son of Late Deo Charan Choudhary, Resident of Punaichak, P.S.- Lal Bahadur Shastri Nagar, District- Patna.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar, through, the Secretary Building Construction Department, 'Vishweshwarraiya Bhawan', Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Central Division, Near High Court, Patna.

¶8

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Shekhar For the Respondent/s : Mr. R. B. Pd. Yadav ( AAG- XI )

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶10

7 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused

¶11

the record.

¶12

The applicant has preferred this review petition in connection with order dated 27.04.2017 passed in Civil Revision No. 168 of 2014.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the petitioner had filed Reference Case No. 122 of 2010 in Bihar Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal, Patna but the claim of the petitioner was dismissed by the Tribunal holding that his claim was time barred and against the aforesaid order, the applicant filed Civil Revision No. 168 of

¶14

Patna High Court C. REV. No.326 of 2017 (7) dt.26-09-2018

¶15

2/2

¶16

2014 but the aforesaid civil revision was, too, dismissed by this court. However, at the time of passing order dated 27.04.2017 in Civil Revision No. 168 of 2014, this court over-looked that final bill in respect of claim of the petitioner had not been prepared by the department as yet.

¶17

I do not find any substance in the submission of learned counsel of applicant and in my view, this review petition is liable to be dismissed on admission stage itself as there is no apparent error on the face of impugned order dated 27.04.2017.

¶18

Accordingly, this review petition stands dismissed on admission stage itself.

¶19

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶20

SHAHZAD/-Rajeev

¶21

Ramesh Chandra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Chandra Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bindeshwari Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Aman Kumar @ Aman Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Goswami Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Sri Bhagwan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajendra Prasad Sah Vs Bausdev Prasad Gupta and Anr.