Allowed

Bindeshwari Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./57224/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coram allowed an anticipatory bail petition filed by Bindeshwari Yadav and Rajiv Yadav in a case involving alleged offences under Section 307 IPC arising from a land dispute, directing release on bail under specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners allowed bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount if arrested or surrendering within four weeks, subject to Section 438(2) conditions.

Bindeshwari Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.57224 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -192 Year- 2016 Thana -SAUR BAZAR District- SAHARSA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bindeshwari Yadav, Son of Sukdeo Yadav,

¶5

Rajiv Yadav, Son of Bindeshwari Yadav. Both residents of Village- Kishanpur, P.S.- Saur Bazar (Patarghat O.P.), District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar

¶12

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sour Bazar (Patharghat O.P.) P.S. Case No. 192 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Although, petitioners are named in the first information report but no specific overt-act has been attributed against the petitioners. There is case and counter case between the parties and it appears that occurrence took place on account of land dispute. Moreover, one co-accused, Ramanand Yadav, against whom there is allegation of assault, has already been

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57224 of 2018 (2) dt.20-09-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

admitted to anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 20.06.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21464 of 2018.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in Sour Bazar (Patharghat O.P.) P.S. Case No. 192 of 2016 subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶21

SHAHZAD/-

¶22

U T

Bindeshwari Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bindeshwari Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Prasad Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shyama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijendra Kumar Pandey Vs Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Chairman, Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan, P

Aman Kumar @ Aman Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Goswami Vs The State Of Bihar

Renu Devi Vs The State Of Bihar