The petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the application. The court allowed the prayer and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Prayer for withdrawal of the application allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3602 of 2016 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1848 of 2016
====================================================== Sunil Kumar, Son of Late Sri Krishna, Resident of House No.- M.I.G. H- 250, Lohiya Nagar, Kankarbagh, Post- Lohiya Nagar, P.S.- Kankarbagh, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Madhuri Lata, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey AAG15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
4 25-08-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the application.
Prayer is allowed. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Arvind/-
U
Sunil Kumar
The State of Bihar
Dr. Dharmendra Singh Gangwar
Mr. Sushil Kumar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
