In an oral order, the Patna High Court held that no reason existed to proceed with a contempt application as the petitioner's statement showed no threat against her. The application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3305 of 2016
In
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.858 of 2013
======================================================
Nilam Devi @ Chhahanguriya Wife of Devan Sharma Resident of Village - Dholi, P.S.- Bangaon, District- Saharsa.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate Miss. Manika, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP2 Prashant Pratap ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 25-08-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel representing the State.
In view of the statement made in paragraph 9 of the show cause wherein it is categorically recorded that the statement of the petitioner has been recorded and that there is no threat on her person, this Court does not find any reason to proceed with the contempt application.
In case, the petitioner has still any grievance for any reason, she can seek her remedy in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law.
Patna High Court MJC No.3305 of 2016(2) dt.25-08-2018 2/2
The application stands disposed off.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
avin/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is any ground to proceed with the contempt application against the petitioner given her recorded statement.
Nilam Devi @ Chhahanguriya
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
