The petitioner did not appear. The court found the respondent's show cause indicated compliance with the impugned order. Consequently, the miscellaneous petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1836 of 2016
======================================================
Surendra Kumar Shrivastava, Son of Late Chandrika Prasad, Resident of Mohalla - New Chandmari, Near Durga Mandir, Motihari,P.S. - Motihari, District - East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar, AC to SC-4
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 24-08-2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned AC to SC-4 is present.
On perusal of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no.3 and going through the paragraph 5 of the same, this Court finds that there is a statement that the order of this Court has already been complied with by issuing notification of promotion as contained in Annexure-A to the show cause.
Taking note of the aforementioned fact and that the petitioner is not appearing to press this application, it is hereby dismissed.
Arvind/-
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
U
Surendra Kumar Shrivastava
The State of Bihar
Sri Amir Subhani
Smt. Sujata Chaturvedi
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
