Petitioner sought restoration of a dismissed writ petition alleging stale claim and laches. Court found no sufficient ground for restoration due to vague reasons for absence and inordinate delay without explanation, dismissing the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1479 of 2017 IN
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9021 of 2011
=========================================================== Arun Kumar, Son of Sri Birendra Prasad, Resident of Saket Bhawan, Road No. 13-C, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Kadam Kuan, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties
=========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Opposite Parties : Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-06-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned counsel for the opposite parties.
Patna High Court MJC No.1479 of 2017 dt.20-06-2018
2/2
(Vikash Jain, J)
B.T/Chandran
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | N.A. |
| Uploading Date |
27.06.2018 |
| Transmission Date |
N.A. |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution is maintainable?
Arun Kumar
Magadh University
The Principal, S.M.D. College, Sripalpur
Sri Ram Singh
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
