High Court dismissed an application for bail filed by the petitioner in the Bikramganj P.S. case involving Section 366A IPC. The trial was advanced and the victim remained unrecovered.
Bail prayer dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28408 of 2018 (3) dt.20-06-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.28408 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -126 Year- 2017 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)
====================================================== Chhotu Singh @ Rishikesh Singh S/o Permanand Singh, R/o Vill.Dharupur, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 20-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28408 of 2018 (3) dt.20-06-2018
not been recovered. The petitioner does not deserve the privilege of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Md. Ibrarul/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners bail prayer should be allowed in the advanced stage of trial where the victim has not been recovered.
Chhotu Singh @ Rishikesh Singh
The State of Bihar
VIKASH JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
