Dismissed

Jagdish Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jun 2018CR. MISC./31625/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the bail petition of Jagdish Yadav and Umesh Yadav, who have been in custody since November 2016 in connection with offences under Sections 148, 302 IPC, etc. The court held that no subsequent development was brought to justify amending the earlier rejection.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail dismissed with no subsequent development recorded.

Jagdish Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31625 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2014 Thana -BELHAR District- BANKA

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jagdish Yadav, S/o Late Ayodhya Yadav

¶5

Umesh Yadav, S/o Late Lalo Yadav

¶6

Both are resident of Village- Tengara, P.S. Belhar, District- Banka.

¶7

.... .... Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

.... .... Opposite Party

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioners : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 20-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners, who are in custody since 15.11.2016. have renewed their prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 522 of 2017 arising out of Belhar P.S. Case No. 147 of 2014 for the offences alleged under Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 324, 307, 302 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by order dated 10.08.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 20951 of 2017.

¶16

It is submitted that similarly situated co-accused Kanhaiya Yadav was granted bail by this Court on 02.11.2015 in Cr. Misc. No. 30948 of 2015.

¶17

The prayer for bail was denied in the case of the petitioners on 10.08.2017 whereas bail order of co-accused Karu Yadav @ Kru Yadav, as relied by the petitioner, was passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10397 of 2015 as far back as on 30.06.2015 and was thus already taken into account by this Court in its earlier order. No subsequent development has been brought on record to take a

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31625 of 2018 (2) dt.20-06-2018

¶19

2/2

¶20

different view of the matter.

¶21

The bail petition accordingly stands dismissed.

¶22

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶23

B.T/Chandran

¶24

U T

Jagdish Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Abuzar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Prakash Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kailash Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Krishna Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate Kaimur At Bhabhua, Namely Sri Rajeshwar Prasad a

Chhotu Singh @ Rishikesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar Vs Magadh University, Through The Registrar Magadh University, Bodh Gaya and Ors.