In an oral order dated 06-11-2018, the Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition as incompetent due to the petitioner's reluctance to take steps for the restoration of the petition against a necessary party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.829 of 2009
======================================================
Mridul Kumar Sharan, S/o Late Ishwar Sharan, R/o Vikramadityapath, Salempur, P.S. Chapra (T), Distt. Saran at Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Ga2)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY
ORAL ORDER
Noticing reluctance on the part of the petitioner in not taking steps for restoration of the writ petition against respondent No. 3- Registrar, Jai Prakash University, who is necessary party in the writ petition, no indulgence is required since the writ petition is treated as incompetent.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as in-
competent.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Mridul Kumar Sharan
The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
Jay Prakash University through its Vice Chancellor, Chapra
The Registrar, Jay Prakash University, Chapra
Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University through its Vice Chancellor, Muzaffarpur
The Registrar, Baba Saheb Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University through its Vice Chancellor, Muzaffarpur
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
