The High Court at Patna addressed petitioner reluctance to restore the writ petition regarding necessary parties. Deeming the writ petition incompetent on this account, the Court dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6618 of 2009
======================================================
Shambhu Kumar Chaurasia, son of Baleshwar Prasad, resident of MohallaKanchan Nagar, Ward No. 6, P.O. + P.S. Bhabhua (Kaimur), District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kr.Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp18)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
taking steps for restoration of the writ petition against respondent Nos. 7 to 9 who are the necessary parties in the writ petition, no indulgence is required since the writ petition is treated as incompetent.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as incompetent.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Shambhu Kumar Chaurasia
The State Of Bihar
The Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Human Resources Development Department
The District Magistrate, Kaimur
The District Education Officer, Kaimur
The District Superintendent of Education, Kaimur
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
