Bharti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner due to subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14064 of 2014
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, AC to GP 10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
4 06-11-2018 In view of the subsequent development, learned
counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioners have to take steps for challenging the
Patna High Court CWJC No.14064 of 2014(4) dt.06-11-2018 2/2
order which was passed by the respondents during pendency of the present writ petition, in a separate writ proceeding.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
mrl./-
U
Bharti Kumari d/o Dularchand Prasad
State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court