The single-judge bench of this High Court disposed of the writ application as infructuous due to the passage of time without making any substantive order or deciding the merits of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6965 of 2015
======================================================
Smt. Sudama Devi, W/o Ram Prakash Rai, Resident of village: Brahmpuri , P.o-Basuki Bihari, Prakhand - Madhwapur, District : Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ga10- Nivedita Nirvikar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 27-11-2018
Mr. Ratan Kumar Kumar, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present writ application with the passage of time has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the writ application is disposed of as having become infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U
Smt. Sudama Devi, W/o Ram Prakash Rai
The State of Bihar through the Secretary Primary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar
The Collector Madhubani
The Regional Deputy Director Education, Darbhanga
The District Education Officer, Madhubani
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
