The High Court of Judicature at Patna disposed of a writ application by relying on an order passed by the District Education Officer. The Court directed respondents to act upon a specific office order without passing a fresh order.
No fresh order; respondents directed to act on Office Memo No. 4432 dated 16.11.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10691 of 2014
======================================================
Vijay Kumar Rai, Son of Sri Late Ramdeo Rai, Resident of Village- Saidabad, PO- Mohanpur, P.S.-Raghopur, District-Vaishali. . Petitioner/s
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bajarangi Lal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA X - Nivedita Nirvikar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
In view of the order passed by the District Education
Officer, Vaishali contained in Annexure-A, no order need be passed.
order as contained in memo no.4432 dated 16.11.2018 in its letter and spirit.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
uday/-
U
Vijay Kumar Rai
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Vaishali
The District Education Officer, Vaishali
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
