A writ petition challenging the calculation of pensionary benefits was dismissed. The court noted the absence of the petitioner and accepted the State's explanation regarding service calculation policy.
None as the petition was dismissed in default due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17918 of 2016
===========================================================
Charan Paswan, Son of Late Jungi Paswan, Resident of Village- Ekara, P.O. Thathan Bujurg, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 13-09-2018
Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned
counsel for the State has assisted the Court.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17918 of 2016 dt.13-09-2018
2/2
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar
AFR/NAFR U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application challenging the pensionary benefits calculation requires a hearing despite no appearance by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Charan Paswan
The State of Bihar
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
