The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's third application for anticipatory bail in a P.S. case under IPC Sections 409/34, noting that previous prayers on merits were rejected and a judicial court had taken cognizance based on materials against the petitioner.
The application for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1965 of 2016
Arising Out of P.S. Case No. -34 Year- 2008 Thana -BAISI District- PURNIA
===========================================================
Guneshwar Singh S/o Raghunath Singh, Resident of Beshrajpur, P.S.- Mahnar, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 12-09-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1965 of 2016 dt.12-09-2018
2/2
privilege of Anticipatory Bail.
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)
P. Kumar
| AFR/NAFR U T |
|---|
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite prior rejections and the fact that a judicial court has taken cognizance?
Whether the submission of the final form by police constitutes a fresh ground for granting anticipatory bail?
Guneshwar Singh
The State of Bihar
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
