Dismissed

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Tunna Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Sept 2018CR. MISC./22468/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous petition filed as the second application for anticipatory bail, the Patna High Court dismissed the plea by relying on the strengthened position of the opposite party that cognizance has already been taken by a judicial court.

What did the court decide?

The petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed with an observation regarding potential future consideration if the petitioner appears for bail.

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Tunna Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 22468 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2012 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Tunna Thakur, Son of Sri Shivjee Thakur, Resident of village- Nethua, P.S.- Marhaura, District- Saran at Chapra

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

¶9

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶10

Date: 12-09-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends arrest in Marhaura P.S. Case No. 55 of 2012 dated 08.03.2012 instituted under Sections 147/148/149/448/307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the

¶14

Arms Act.

¶15

This is the second attempt for Anticipatory Bail by the petitioner as earlier when the petitioner had moved in Cr. Misc. No. 21669 of 2013, he had withdrawn the application on 23.07.2013.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter relates to an occurrence in which two sides have fought among themselves and there is a case and counter case. It was submitted that in the present case and in the counter case also,

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22468 of 2016 dt.12-09-2018

¶18

2/2

¶19

cognizance has been taken.

¶20

Learned A.P.P submitted that once a judicial Court has taken cognizance, the petitioner should be directed to avail of the remedy available to him in law.

¶21

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court finds substance in the contention of learned A.P.P. Once a judicial Court upon applying its mind has taken cognizance based on the report submitted by the police, this Court would not go into the veracity or legality or validity of such order taking cognizance for the purposes of considering the present application.

¶22

Thus, the present application stands dismissed with the observation that as has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, if the police did not find substance in the allegation against him, besides other points, which may be available to him, the Court shall consider such aspect while considering the case of the petitioner when he appears before the Court for bail.

¶23

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶24

P. Kumar

¶25

AFR/NAFR U T

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Tunna Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Tunna Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Jha Vs The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and Ors.

Chandra Shekhar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gauri Shankar Singh Vs The B. N. Mandal University Through The Registrar and Ors.

Guneshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Daresh Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Mokhtar Vs The State Of Bihar