Court disposed of the writ petition by observing that the facts are identical to C.W.J.C. No. 9451 of 2013; if the petitioner was covered in that prior case, the same benefit should be extended.
Directed concerned authority to examine if petitioner was covered by C.W.J.C. No. 9451 of 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17410 of 2015
===========================================================
Laldeo Prasad Son of Late Sukhdeo Sah resident of village and Post office - Kuawan, Police Station and Block - Chakiya, District - East Champaran at Motihari at Present Posted as Panchayat Secretary at Kalyanpur Block, District - East Champaran at Motihari
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. A. Ujjwal, SC25
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-09-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 9451 of 2013 (Brajesh Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.
In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of the petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case,
Patna High Court CWJC No.17410 of 2015 dt.25-09-2018
2 /2
the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition
is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Vinay/Sunny
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | 26.9.2018 |
| Transmission Date |
NA |
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Brajesh Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.Referred¶18
C.W.J.C. No. 9451 of 2013 (Brajesh Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.)
Laldeo Prasad
State of Bihar
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
