This is a brief oral judgment where the Patna High Court examined a writ petition identical to a prior case. The court directed the authority to extend the benefit of that previous order to the petitioner and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10012 of 2018
===========================================================
Niranjan Kumar S/o Rajkumar Verma R/o Village - Chandra Nagar, Post - Kosi College, P.S. - Muffasil, Dist. - Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Md. Nadeem Seraj- GP5
Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, AC to GP5
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 24-09-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 16102 of 2016 (Ranjit Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and its analogues cases, the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.
In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended
Patna High Court CWJC No.10012 of 2018 dt.24-09-2018
2 /2
to the petitioner.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, this
writ petition is disposed of.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
Vinay/Sunny
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | 25.9.2018 |
| Transmission Date |
NA |
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of a prior judgment establishing similar facts and legal issues.
Whether the concerned authority should extend the benefit of the order in C.W.J.C. No. 16102 of 2016 to the present petitioner.
How to dispose of the writ petition on the basis of the referenced precedent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ranjit Kumar vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.Referred¶17
C.W.J.C. No. 16102 of 2016 (Ranjit Kumar Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.)
Niranjan Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
