Disposed

Shiv Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Oct 2018CWJC/15803/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged non-appointment due to height discrepancy in Home Guard recruitment. Court refrained from deciding merits but directed authorities to examine grievance within three weeks considering annexed representation.

What did the court decide?

The Authority is directed to examine the petitioner's grievance and take a decision within three weeks considering the representation.

Shiv Raj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15803 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shiv Raj Kumar, son of Munni Lal Sah, Resident of Village + P.O. Saghwa, P.S. Rangra Chowk, Dist. Bhagalpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Central Selection Board, through its Chairman, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Chairman, Central Selection Board, Bihar, Patna.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Prabhakar Thakur, Adv. Mr. Shankar Kumar Choudhary, Adv. For the State : Mr. Apurva Kumar, AC to GA4 For the CSBC : Mr. Binod Kr. Mishra, Adv. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 04-10-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel

¶15

for the State.

¶16

In this case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has qualified in the preliminary test as well as mains examination. As per advertisement, for E.B.C., the height was prescribed as 162 CM. The petitioner is short by 0.3 CM and makes a prayer that sympathetic consideration be taken and he should be appointed.

¶17

Already the petitioner is working as a Home Guard. This Court is not giving any opinion on the merit of the case. Let the authority should examine the grievance of the petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.15803 of 2018(2) dt.04-10-2018 2/2

¶19

and will take a decision in accordance with law within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of

¶20

this order.

¶21

The authority while considering the grievance of the petitioner will take into account the representation of the petitioner annexed as Annexure-4 to this writ application.

¶22

With the aforementioned observation and direction, this writ application is disposed of.

¶23

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶24

rishi/-

¶25

Shiv Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Safi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Hemant Kumar Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandan Mahato and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sujata Vishwakarma Vs Chief Managing Director, U C O Bank and Ors.

Faiyaz Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.