Disposed

Faiyaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 Oct 2018CWJC/13558/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna held that the petitioner must file a detailed representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police to verify his claim of wrong pay fixation causing pension loss. Authorities granted four months to verify and two months to pay arrears if claimed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file detailed representation within four months; if claim verified, arrears to be paid within two months.

Faiyaz Ahmad Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13558 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Faiyaz Ahmad, S/o Late Mokhtar Ahmad, R/o Officer's Colony, Budhuchak, Near Modern Idol Shool, Katihar, P.S.- Katihar, Distt.- Katihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Patna Zone, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Central range, Patna.

¶9

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 6. The Dy. S.P. (HQ) Patna cum Account Incharge.

¶10

The Accountant, S.S.P. Office, Patna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravi Verma, AC to GP4 ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-10-2018

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for

¶15

the State.

¶16

In this case, the petitioner is claiming that his pay-scale has wrongly been fixed resulting into reduction of his rate of pension.

¶17

As per petitioner, according to prior fixation, he was entitled to Rs. 9,45,905/- but, was paid Rs. 7,20,467/- and there is a difference of Rs. 2,25,438/-.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proper pay fixation has not been done, that has caused loss to the petitioner.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.13558 of 2018 dt.04-10-2018 2/2

¶20

Let the petitioner should file a proper representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna with full details as to how he is claiming the amount of money which has been mentioned in the present writ application should be verified by the authority looking to his grievance with respect to wrong fixation of his pay.

¶21

Let the entire process should be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of this order.

¶22

If the authority is arrived to a finding that the claim of the petitioner is correct, it goes without saying that he will be entitled to the arrear amount which must be paid to him without unnecessary delay preferably within a period of two months after the date of order passed by the aforesaid authority.

¶23

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶24

rishi/-

¶25

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	11.10.2018
Transmission Date

Faiyaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faiyaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Safi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Hemant Kumar Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chandan Mahato and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sujata Vishwakarma Vs Chief Managing Director, U C O Bank and Ors.

Shiv Raj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Prasad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.