Disposed

Lal Jha v. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and Ors.

Patna HC11 Sept 2018CWJC/10554/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by an employee seeking payment of admissible dues. The respondent admitted dues of Rs. 16,95,100/- but deferred E.P.F. payment to a third party. Court disposed of the petition, granting relief for other dues and providing liberty regarding E.P.F.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; cheque of Rs. 16,95,100/- handed over; liberty to approach appropriate forum for E.P.F. dues.

Lal Jha Vs The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10554 of 2017

¶2

===========================================================

¶3

Lal Jha, Son of Late Ghuran Jha, Resident of Village- Chikna, P.S.- Ghoghardiha, District- Madhubani, at present residing at C/o Sri Chandra Prasad, Mohalla- Purani Jakkanpur, Kahartoli, P.S.- Jakkanpur, District- Patna.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Secretary-cum-Special Director.

¶7

The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

¶8

The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna.

¶9

.... .... Respondent/s

¶10

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Mukul, Advocate For the B.S.S.B. : Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram and Mr. Shashank Shekhar Jha, Advocates

¶11

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT

¶12

Date: 11-09-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Board’)

¶14

Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Board indicating that the admissible dues of the petitioner have been calculated which comes to Rs. 16,95,100/-. Learned counsel for the Board had produced cheque of the aforesaid amount which has been handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today.

¶15

In view thereof, it is not in dispute that except for E.P.F., the Board has discharged its duty. Even with regard to E.P.F., learned counsel for the Board submitted that they have forwarded what was required on their part relating to the petitioner to the

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.10554 of 2017 dt.11-09-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

Employees Provident Fund Organization, which is required to pay such dues to the petitioner.

¶19

As the E.P.F.O. is not party in the present writ application, the Court cannot issue any direction in that regard.

¶20

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum/authority with regard to payment of his remaining admitted dues, if any, expeditiously.

¶21

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶22

P. Kumar

¶23

AFR/NAFR U

Lal Jha v. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lal Jha v. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Shekhar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Gauri Shankar Singh Vs The B. N. Mandal University Through The Registrar and Ors.

Dr. Baren Bose Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Kumar Singh @ Tunna Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar

Guneshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Daresh Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.