Rajiv Kumar @ Bablu and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a criminal revision petition, which the Court granted as it had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.482 of 2015
====================================================== 1. Rajiv Kumar @ Bablu Son of Pramod Kumar Singh @ Mohan Singh
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Ms. Archna Shahi, Advocte. Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Durgesh Nandan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 19-01-2018 Ms. Archna Shahi, the learned advocate seeks permission to withdraw this revision petition, as it has become infructuous.
The petition is dismissed as has become infructuous.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
KKSINHA/-
U T
Rajiv Kumar @ Bablu and Vijaya Devi
The State of Bihar and Uma Devi
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court