Allowed

Md. Rahman Abdin @ Rahman Aavdin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC18 Jan 2018CR. MISC./48016/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a complaint case involving offences under Sections 406, 420, and 120B of the IPC, directing his release upon surrender within four weeks subject to bond conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail upon surrender within four weeks, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Md. Rahman Abdin @ Rahman Aavdin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.48016 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2116 Year- 2015 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. RAHMAN ABDIN @ RAHMAN AAVDIN Son of Ainul Abdin, R/o Village- Puraini, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Rajiv Kumar @ Ritesh Ranjan Son of Ram Lakhan Podar, R/o VillageBaluachak, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

¶9

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Najmul Hodda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 18-01-2018 Heard the learned counsels for the petitioner, the informant and the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2116 of 2015 dated 15.09.2015 instituted for the offences under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

From the perusal of the complaint itself, it would appear that on the assurance of co-accused, viz. Saharyar Abdin, money was deposited by the complainant in Wealth Agro Industries Ltd.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the aforesaid company is incorporated under the Indian

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48016 of 2017 (4) dt.18-01-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

Companies Act, 1956 and the brother of the petitioner had been managing the affairs of the company. The petitioner has only been shown as a cashier in the complaint petition. It has further been submitted that some of the other co-accused persons, who are his family members, have been granted anticipatory bail. Co-accused Saharyar Abdin was in jail and he too has been granted bail.

¶19

Considering the nature of allegation, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, subject to his furnishing bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IX, Bhagalpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 2116/2015.

¶20

(Ashutosh Kumar, J.)

¶21

Rakhi

¶22

U T

Md. Rahman Abdin @ Rahman Aavdin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Rahman Abdin @ Rahman Aavdin v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheo Shankar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Kapoor Chand Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonalal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Darpan Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunny Sharma and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajay Kumar Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar