Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a criminal revision petition to contest the trial. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to contest the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.818 of 2017
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Suraj Narain Prasad Sinha, Sr. Advocate. Ms. Mira Kumari For the Respondent : Smt Renu Kumari
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 18-01-2018 Mr. Suraj Narain Prasad Sinha, the learned senior
advocate, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition in order to enable the petitioner to contest the trial which is in progress.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
KKSINHA/-
U T
Sunny Sharma and Another
The State of Bihar and Another
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
