Allowed

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Dec 2018CR. MISC./76748/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Released the petitioner on bail in connection with allegations of deficiency in cement percentage and soil settlement deduction charges under sections 406, 409, 420/34 IPC, requiring reliable surrender and execution of bond within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Released the petitioner on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/ each with two sureties of like amount subject to surrender within 4 weeks.

Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Labour and Industrial Disputes | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.76748 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2018 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mukesh Kumar Singh, Son of Ramji Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageJagatpur, Police Station- Telmar, District- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Soni Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 21-12-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶14

learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Araria P. S. case no. 502/2018 registered under sections 406, 409 and 420/34 of the IPC.

¶16

Petitioner was assistant engineer and he has been charged with allegation that percentage of cement was found less as per prescribed norms and did not deduct the settlement of soil.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention towards annexure 2 at page 116 as well as annexure 4 at page 120 and submitted that the then executive engineer measured and inspected the work done under the supervision of the petitioner and no illegality was found and accordingly, he

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76748 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/2

¶19

prepared measurement report on 23.2.2012 and similarly, measurement of the work of the petitioner was done and the above stated accusation was found untrue. It is further pointed out on behalf of the petitioner that the present case has been lodged on the basis of measurement and inspection done in the year 2018 whereas work was completed in the year 2011. It is also informed that co-accused Mahendra Chaudhary @ Mahendra Yadav, having more or less similar allegation, has already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 19.12.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 73013/2018.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, in the event of arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Araria P. S. case no. 502/2018 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶22

s.hassan/- U T

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vineet Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Manir Ahmad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gopal Das @ Gopal Ravidas Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Prem Chand Kumar @ Buchi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jaya Devi @ Mos. Jaya Devi Vs The State Of Bihar