Allowed

Kanhaiya Sah @ Chiga @ Chigu @ Kainucha Pd. @ Chigu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2018CR. MISC./74502/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties with specific conditions to ensure cooperation with the trial and prevent tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to specified conditions.

Kanhaiya Sah @ Chiga @ Chigu @ Kainucha Pd. @… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.74502 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2018 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

KANHAIYA SAH @ CHIGA @ CHIGU @ KAINUCHA PD. @ CHIGU son of Late Jagdish Prasad Sah, Resident of Village- Amarpur, Police StationAmarpur, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Ambastha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 18-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

Petitioner seeks bail in Amarpur P.S. Case No. 489 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 37(b) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

Allegation against petitioner is of being caught in a drunken state.

¶13

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 16.09.2018.

¶14

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.74502 of 2018(3) dt.18-12-2018 2/2

¶16

amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions

¶17

Judge-2nd, Banka , in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No.

¶18

489 of 2018, with following conditions:-

¶19

(1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

¶20

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

¶21

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶22

(4). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

¶23

(S. Kumar, J)

¶24

ranjan/manoj-

¶25

U T

Kanhaiya Sah @ Chiga @ Chigu @ Kainucha Pd. @ Chigu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Sah @ Chiga @ Chigu @ Kainucha Pd. @ Chigu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Dev Vs The State Of Bihar

Nepali Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Mandi Ranjan Choubey @ Mani Ranjan Choubey Vs The State Of Bihar

Badal Kumar @ Seth @ Lavkush Vs The State Of Bihar

Navdeep Singh @ Navdip Singh Vs The State Of Bihar