Umesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.75098 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2018 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Umesh Sah son of Arun Sah, resident of Village- Chota Bariyarpur, P.S.Chhatauni, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arbind Kumar Pandey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 17-12-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 270 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 225 litres of foreign liquor from the car.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 22.09.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75098 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise Act, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 270 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J)
veena/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail can be granted to the accused in the murder case and conviction under IPC Section 302 and IPC Section 34 dealing with accidental death and workman thereof?
Umesh Sah
The State of Bihar
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court