Allowed

Badal Kumar @ Seth @ Lavkush v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2018CR. MISC./72873/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under CrPC regarding offences involving murder and dacoity, the Patna High Court released the petitioner on bail upon furnishing bond and two sureties, subject to specific conditions ensuring court attendance and evidence preservation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount and complying with court conditions.

Badal Kumar @ Seth @ Lavkush Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.72873 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2018 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Badal Kumar @ Seth @ Lavkush, Son of Sri Ram Chanda Prasad @ Ram Chandra Gupta, Resident of Village-Haspura Tola-BareliChak, P.O. & P.S.Hasanpura, District-Aurangabad.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akbar Ali ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 18-12-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

counsel for the State.

¶13

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 82 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379, 302 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Informant who in his written complaint dated 02.05.2018 has alleged that on 01.05.2018 at about 2.00 PM his elder brother Bindeshwari Singh @ Binda and brother in law Ravindra Kumar @ Jatta had gone to purchase Jewelry in Janta Jewellery and his brother and brother in law entered into the shop and he was making purchase from near by shop when he heard the sound of firing and bomb explosion and saw the

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72873 of 2018(3) dt.18-12-2018 2/3

¶16

criminals running away and when he went near the Janta Jewellery shop he saw that FIR named accused including petitioner were assaulting his brother and brother in law and his brother Bindeshwari Singh died while being carried to hospital.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that informant and his two associates were the criminals who had entered the shop Janta Jewellers to commit dacoity and were caught by the mob and thrashed, meanwhile the police arrived and took the two accused who were thrashed by the mob to the hospital where Bindeshwari Singh succumbed to his injuries. The present FIR was lodged by the shop owner of Janta Jewelers on 01.05.2018 and as a counter case the 2^nd FIR was instituted by the accused on 02.05.2018. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.07.2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-III, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No. 409 of 2018/ 411 of 2018 arising out of Haspura P.S. Case No. 82 of 2018 following

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72873 of 2018(3) dt.18-12-2018 3/3

¶20

conditions:-

¶21

(1) Bailor should be local having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of concerned court.

¶22

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

¶23

(3) Petitioner shall not tamper the evidence and if he is found of indulging in tampering of evidence, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

¶24

(S. Kumar, J)

¶25

ranjan/-

¶26

Badal Kumar @ Seth @ Lavkush v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badal Kumar @ Seth @ Lavkush v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Pappu Dev Vs The State Of Bihar

Nepali Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Kanhaiya Sah @ Chiga @ Chigu @ Kainucha Pd. @ Chigu Vs The State Of Bihar

Mandi Ranjan Choubey @ Mani Ranjan Choubey Vs The State Of Bihar

Navdeep Singh @ Navdip Singh Vs The State Of Bihar