Allowed

Md. Aalim and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Dec 2018CR. MISC./71594/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a kidnapping case. The court relied on the victim's consistent 164 Cr.P.C. statement exonerating the petitioners and a domestic understanding.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on anticipatory bail in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No.571 of 2018, subject to furnishing a bail bond and posting sureties.

Md. Aalim and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.71594 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-571 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj

¶3

====================================================== 1. Md. Aalim, Son of Late Eddu Mian. 2. Salma Khatoon Wife of Md. Aalim.

¶4

Abid Ayan @ Md. Abid, Son of Md. Aalim.

¶5

Md. Asif @ Md. Ashik, Son of Md. Aalim, All are resident of Village- Sareya, Ward No. 5, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 19-12-2018

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The prosecution case got initiated on the basis of written report dated 27.09.2018 submitted by Ram Dhayan Gupta to the Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Gopalganj to the effect that on 26.09.2018 at 3.30 P.M. the wife of the informant Varsha Gupta and daughter Nitu Kumari were kidnapped by the petitioners. The informant came to the in-laws house of the wife when the occurrence took place. Earlier also the wife of the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71594 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/3

¶17

informant was kidnapped for which the mother-in-law of the informant submitted a written application on 20.07.2018, but the police has not lodged the case.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that in the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., the victim, who is a major, has not supported the accusation. A statement to that effect has been made in paragraph no.11 of the petition, which reads as under :-

¶19

“11.That it is submitted that the police has recovered the victim lady and her statement u/s 164 Cr. P.C. has been recorded in which she said that her husband used to assault her due to that she came to Gopalganj and Aabid is her friend who helped him to search a house and she has nothing to do with him.”

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner further drew attention of this Court towards order dated 08.10.2018, passed by the learned CJM, Gopalganj, in Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 571 of 2018, from which it appears that the victim is not ready to stay with her husband and the said order does not stipulate anything adverse against the petitioners.

¶21

It is submitted by learned APP for the State that there is specific accusation against the petitioners.

¶22

Considering the statement made under section 164 of the Cr. P.C., wherein, the victim has not alleged anything against

¶23

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71594 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 3/3

¶24

the petitioners, coupled with statement made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj, in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No.571 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶25

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶26

Ashwini/-

¶27

U T

Md. Aalim and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Aalim and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajbalam Mahato @ Rajballam Mahato and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Ravidas @ Birendra Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Uma Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Rajvanshi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalita Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rajesh Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar