Allowed

Lalita Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC19 Dec 2018CR. MISC./71623/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail petition filed by a women petitioner apprehending arrest in a case for unauthorized electricity consumption. The court observed the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and the connection was in her father-in-law's name. The court granted anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail with bail bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of like amount for 12 weeks.

Lalita Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.71623 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-978 Year-2017 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lalita Devi, W/o Avadesh Kumar Deo @ Avdhesh Dev, R/o Battabari Forbesganj, Mattihari, Ward No. 10, P.S. Forbesganj, Dist.- Araria.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Md. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-12-2018

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Company’) and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 135 of the Electricity Act of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The accusation is of unauthorized consumption of electric energy causing loss to the tune of Rs.56,446/-.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the electricity connection is in the name of the father-in-law of the petitioner, namely, Deveshwar Lal. Subsequently, an application was submitted on 22.05.2017 for providing a new connection in

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71623 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/3

¶18

the name of the husband of the petitioner for which meter charge to the tune of Rs.875/- was deposited, but the connection was not provided. Thereafter, the petitioner made a complaint before the Public Grievance Redressal Cell, Farbesganj, hence, the present case has been lodged as a retaliatory measure. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent.

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Company that due to unauthorized consumption of electricity, the loss calculated to the tune of Rs.56,446/- has been caused to the Company.

¶20

Keeping in view the fact that this is not in dispute that the connection is in the name of Deveshwar Lal, the father-inlaw of the petitioner and this fact has not been controverted by learned counsel for the ‘Company’, at earlier point of time, an application was made and the required meter charge has already been deposited for providing of a new connection in the name of the husband of the petitioner and the petitioner, being a lady having no criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.71623 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 3/3

¶22

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Araria, in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No.978 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶24

Ashwini/-

¶25

U T

Lalita Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalita Devi v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajbalam Mahato @ Rajballam Mahato and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Ravidas @ Birendra Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Uma Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Rajvanshi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Tinku Sah @ Abhay Prasad Sah Vs The State Of Bihar