Allowed

Uma Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2018CR. MISC./68038/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition sought anticipatory bail for the petitioner. The court observed that the primary accused were others who snatched the tractor, and similar accused had already been granted bail. Consequently, the petition was allowed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is released on anticipatory bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Uma Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68038 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2018 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Uma Yadav, S/o- Suresh Yadav, resident of Village- Pakadga P.S.- Bagaha, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-12-2018 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶11

The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered

¶12

for the offence punishable under Sections 379 of the IPC.

¶13

The prosecution case, as per the written report of Munna Sah, dated 11.06.2018, submitted to the Station House Officer, Bagaha (Pathkhauli) Police Station, is to the effect that the informant purchased a tractor from a private financial company, namely Magma Financer on 20.05.2018 and when the tractor was being driven by the driver of the informant then four persons, namely Prem Singh, Pappu Yadav, Vijay Sah and Ajay Ram, claiming to be the authorized agents of Magma Financer, took the possession of the tractor and when the informant contacted the said Financer, then the informant was conveyed that no such direction has been issued to anybody to seize the

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68038 of 2018(2) dt.18-12-2018 2/3

¶15

tractor. Thereafter, the informant contacted co-accused Prem Singh, who conveyed that three persons were taking the tractor to the Financer company, but on the way, three persons, being the petitioner and his two brothers, namely, Harinarayan Yadav and Yogendra Yadav, forcefully took away the tractor.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the background of a dispute with the Finance Company, the petitioner has maliciously been roped in the present case. Admittedly, as per the FIR, thrust of accusation is against the persons who actually snatched the tractor from the driver of the informant. Moreover, similarly situated accused persons, namely, Yogendra Yadav and Harinarayan Yadav have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by two different coordinate Benches of this Court, vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 54825 and 51947 of 2018.

¶17

Learned APP submits that there is specific accusation against the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against four persons who snatched the tractor and similarly situated accused persons have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.68038 of 2018(2) dt.18-12-2018 3/3

¶20

learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Bagaha (Pathkhauli) P.S. Case No. 270 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶21

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

Amrendra/-

¶23

U T

Uma Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Ashutosh Kumar @ Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shyam Narayan Singh @ Shyam Kishore Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shyam Kumar Jha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mani Bhushan Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar