Pradeep Jaiswal @ Pradeep Kumar Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge oral order noting that designated Criminal Writ petitions, though allotted to different judges, involve the same factual backdrop. Judge ordered the Chief Justice's office to list them analogously on the same bench after obtaining necessary permission.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61855 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-438 Year-2016 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
======================================================
Pradeep Jaisawal @ Pradeep Kumar Jaisawal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
State Of Bihar and Anr
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 6875 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-438 Year-2016 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Writ petitions arising from the same factum should be heard on the same bench.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pradeep Jaisawal @ Pradeep Kumar Jaisawal
- petitioner
Bishop Phillip S. Masih
- petitioner
DR. EDWIN F. RAWAT @ DR. E.F. RAWAT
- petitioner
M.a. Danieal @ Munnangi Alfred Daniel
- petitioner
Alfrade Andrews
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court