The petitioner filed an application to quash the FIR after the police submitted a chargesheet. The court dismissed the application as infructuous because the investigation was complete and a chargesheet was already filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.24478 of 2017
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2017 Thana -ISHAKCHAK District- BHAGALPUR
====================================================== Ajeet Prasad son of Upendra Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Naya Tola, Gumti No. 1, Bhikanpur, P.S.- Ishakchak, District- Bhagalpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that during the predency of the present application, the police have completed the investigation and submitted chargesheet in the court below.
In view of the submission made above, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md.S./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR remains maintainable when the police has submitted a chargesheet during the pendency of the application.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ajeet Prasad
The State of Bihar
Sri Deepak Prasad
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
