Allowed

Bhola Panjiyar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Dec 2018CR. MISC./66604/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail for alleged involvement in theft of government solar plates. Court noted discrepancies in procurement claims and lack of name in FIR. Grant of bail subject to sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Bhola Panjiyar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.66604 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2018 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Bhola Panjiyar Son of Rajdeo Panjiyar

¶5

Krishna Panjiyar @ Kishan Kumar Son of Rajdeo Panjiyar Both R/o Village-Bhutahi, P.S.-Sonbarsa, District-Sitamarhi.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 17-12-2018

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶10

the State.

¶11

The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Sonbarasa P. S. Case No. 119 of 2018 dated 25.06.2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Eight solar plates, which were installed under a government scheme, were found to be missing. The prosecution of the petitioner in the present case is on the basis of recovery of two of such solar plates from their roof tops.

¶13

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners has

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66604 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2

¶15

submitted that the aforesaid solar plates, which are said to have been recovered from their roof tops, are the ones which they have purchased. In support of this contention, learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn the attention of this Court to the sale-letters of the aforesaid solar plates.

¶16

Taking this fact into account as also that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. and they have clean antecedents, they are directed to be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarasa P. S. Case No. 119 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶17

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶18

skm/-

¶19

Bhola Panjiyar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhola Panjiyar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rita Bihari Sinha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Irshad @ MD Ishad Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Misrail @ Misrail and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Yogendra Yadav @ Yogindra Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kailash Raw @ Kailash Prasad Mandal @ Kailash Rao and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Akram @ Md. Akram Khan Vs The State Of Bihar