Allowed

Md. Irshad @ MD Ishad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Dec 2018CR. MISC./66481/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing immediate release upon surrender and furnishing of bail bonds with two sureties to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhaka, East Champaran.

Md. Irshad @ MD Ishad Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.66481 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2018 Thana- DHAKA District-

¶3

East Champaran

¶4

========================================== MD. IRSHAD @ MD ISHAD, Son of Late Sheikh Wazul Haque, Resident of Village- Bahlolpur, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

========================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Zaki Haider For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umeshnand Pandit ========================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-12-2018

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his

¶14

arrest in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 146 of 2018 dated 05.05.2018 instituted for the offences under Sections

¶15

420, 467, 468, 471, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

From the perusal of the F.I.R, it would appear that with respect to an exchange deed of the year 1998, the F.I.R has been lodged in the year 2018.

¶17

It has been alleged that the petitioner along with others, by befooling the informant, has got a wrong land transferred/exchanged in place of the land of the petitioner.

¶18

The assurance of the petitioner and others of compensating

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66481 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2

¶20

the informant has also not been respected.

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after full knowledge of all the facts, the informant agreed for exchange deed and he cannot be permitted to rake up the issue after more than twenty years.

¶22

The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents.

¶23

Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today before the learned Court below, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 146 of 2018, G.R. Case No. 509 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

¶25

Shageer/-

¶26

U T

Md. Irshad @ MD Ishad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Irshad @ MD Ishad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birbal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandrashekhar Singh @ Chandrashekhar Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Mandal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rita Bihari Sinha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Misrail @ Misrail and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nagendra Rai And Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar