Petitioners pressed for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal complaint but did not insist on the petition as existing apprehension of arrest was removed by a stay order on cognizance proceedings in a related matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.66594 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-473 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT
CASE District- Jamui
==========================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
==========================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar
==========================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 17-12-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioners while
pressing the anticipatory bail of the petitioners who are
apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case
No. 473-C of 2018 in which cognizance as been taken under
Sections 506, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has stated
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66594 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2
that petitioners has also challenged the order of cognizance vide Cr. Misc. No. 57386 of 2018. In the aforesaid case, notice has been issued to the complainant and further proceedings in the complaint case has been stayed by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.10.2018.
With the aforesaid facts, there is no apprehension
of arrest of the petitioners now.
In that view of the matter, the petitioners do not press this petition for the present but reserve their liberty to approach this Court again when need so arises.
The petition is disposed off as not pressed with the liberty aforesaid.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Shageer/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail petition requires resorting to in the absence of apprehension of arrest due to stay in cognizance proceedings.
Kailash Raw @ Kailash Prasad Mandal & Ors.
The State of Bihar & Ors.
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
