Allowed

Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nutt v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Mar 2018CR. MISC./6124/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Sunil Nat, in a murder case (PS Case 360/2017). The court imposed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions requiring physical presence during trial and attendance within two consecutive hearings.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Gaya.

Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nutt Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6124 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -360 Year- 2017 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA

¶3

====================================================== Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nutt, S/o Nakul Nat, Resident of Village- Jagadhar, P.S.Tekari, District- Gaya.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 22-03-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State.

¶12

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Tekari P.S.Case No. 360 of 2017 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian penal Code.

¶13

Allegation in brief is that informant’s father dead body was found thrown in the field after having been killed him by sharp cutting weapon and suspicion is raised against petitioner as he had threatened a few days back.

¶14

It is contended that there is admittedly land dispute between both sides and petitioner and deceased were co-workers in a brick kiln and due to land dispute he has been implicated in this case and petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶15

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner, namely, Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nutt, is directed to be

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6124 of 2018 (5) dt.22-03-2018

¶17

2/2

¶18

released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 360 of 2017 with condition that one of the bailor must be his close family member. Petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date during trial and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without any reasonable ground, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶19

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶20

Sujit/-

¶21

U T

Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nutt v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Nat @ Sunil Nutt v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Shamim @ Aslam @ Md. Ashlam Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajan Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Amrish Sharma @ Amrish Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Gopi Jaiswal Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikki Mishra @ Vikki Jha Vs The State Of Bihar