Gopi Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
An oral order rejecting bail for a petitioner already in custody for theft related to recovery of a mobile phone, citing criminal antecedents as the primary reason for refusal.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail rejected.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16325 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2017 Thana- RAMGARH District- Bhabhua (Kaimur)
======================================================
Gopi Jaiswal, S/o Thakur Prasad Jaiswal, Resident of Village- 217, Mircha Road Uttar Mohalla Mircha Kusi, P.S.- Dildar Nagar, Dist- Gazipur (U.P.)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar Seth For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. SRI KUMAR VIRENDRA NARAYAN ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner who is already in custody for theft as he has criminal antecedents and a looted mobile was recovered from him.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gopi Jaiswal
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Arun Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court