Dismissed

Birendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC19 Sept 2018CR. MISC./56514/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition for bail, the Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer due to non-compliance with a prior bail order. Directed the trial court to expedite the trial. The petitioner had earlier been granted provisional bail conditioned on payment or providing a flat within nine months, which he failed to fulfill, leading to arrest and remand. The court noted his lack o

What did the court decide?

Permission for bail on grounds of compliance with previous order refused; trial directed to be concluded as early as possible.

Birendra Prasad Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56514 of 2018 (2) dt.19-09-2018

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.56514 of 2018

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1887 Year- 2013 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-

¶5

PATNA

¶6

====================================================== Birendra Prasad Singh, Son of Late Jai Nandan Singh, Resident of 3-C, Sneh Plaza, Sardar Patel Path, North, S.K. Puri, District- Patna.

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar.

¶9

Amit Kumar Nag, Son of Nalini Kanta Nag, Flat No.203, Rameshwaram Apartment, D.V.C. Road Yarpur, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna.

¶10

.... .... Opposite Parties

¶11

====================================================== Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP.

¶13

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶14

02 19.09.2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well

¶15

as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

Earlier petitioner filed Cr. Misc. No. 33147 of

¶17

2015 for grant of bail and this court granted provisional bail to him for the period of nine months with condition that he shall ensure the payment of amount in question to the complainant within the above stated period of nine months or shall make available flat of the same rate to the complainant but admittedly, neither petitioner returned the money nor provided flat to the complainant.

¶18

Furthermore, it appears from the impugned

¶19

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56514 of 2018 (2) dt.19-09-2018

¶20

¶21

order dated 01.06.2018 that petitioner did not surrender before the court even after expiry of nine months and after cancellation his bail bonds, he was arrested and produced before the court and thereafter, he was remanded in this case.

¶22

The above stated fact goes to show that the petitioner does not have any respect to the order of this court and, therefore, considering the conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to release him on bail and accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1887 ( C ) of 2013 stands rejected. However, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same as early as possible.

¶23

Shahid/Abhijeet

¶24

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶25

U T

Birendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birendra Prasad Singh v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Sinha Vs Mr. Sanjeev Srivastava @ Sanjeev and Anr.

Satyendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Shri Ram Saran @ Ram Saran Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shyama Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijendra Kumar Pandey Vs Dr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Chairman, Bihar State Co. Operative Marketing Union Ltd., Biscomaun Bhawan, P

Md. Imteyaj @ Md. Emteyaz @ Imtiyaz @ Md. Imtiyaz @ Md. Imtaj Vs The State Of Bihar