Allowed

Ramji Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2018CR. MISC./55358/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail in a case involving criminal conspiracy and forgery coupled with Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act charges. The court observed no incriminating articles were recovered from the petitioner's possession. Bail was granted on a bond.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions that bailors be close relatives.

Ramji Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.55358 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -251 Year- 2018 Thana -MASHRAK District- SARAN

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramji Prasad Son of Late Kanhaiya Prasad, Resident of VillageHaminpur, P.S. Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh

¶9

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in Masrakh P.S. Case No. 251/2018, instituted for the offences under Sections 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 30, 30(a), 38 and 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no recovery of any incriminating articles from conscious possession of this petitioner. It is alleged that recovery was made by the police from the vehicles standing in front of temple as mentioned in the written report. Police arrested the petitioner and other accused persons.

¶13

From the written report, it appears that there is no any

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55358 of 2018 (2) dt.20-09-2018

¶15

2/2

¶16

recovery from conscious possession of this petitioner.

¶17

The petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2018.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances,

¶19

prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned VIth A.D.J., Saran, Chapra in connection with Masrakh P.S. Case No. 251/2018, subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

¶20

(Sanjay Priya, J.)

¶21

Rakhi

¶22

U T

Ramji Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramji Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Kunal Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramchandra Mahto Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jitan Sah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Samid Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shailesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar